|
My first thought is good for you for taking care of an injured animal. After reading your post again, I am more than a little concerned. You say that not only the vets at Purdue said she probably wouldn't be a good surgery candidate, but no other vets did either. Let me ask a question and expose myself to some possible backlash. Why do we depend so much on the help of our medical professionals to come and fix our beloved pets when we need them, and when they do they are our heroes, yet when they give us SOUND, REASONABLE, and most of all HUMANE advise about an animal that is suffering from such a severe injury, we completely ignore their advise that we JUST PAID FOR? I have rescued many animals, and I was glad to do it. I just can't possibly see how this poor creature can have a good outcome. I have broken my femur before and the thought of laying around with doctors saying it's not worth surgery makes me realize how serious this break is. So instead of a permanent surgical solution, someone is going to tape and splint me up and expect everything to be ok? I can't imagine the pain that poor creature is suffering from no matter how brave a face it puts up. Is surviving
alone the main factor here or does quality of life come in to play at some point? Is an animal that is unable to live the life that it's instincts tell it to really happy? I love animals and spend my life with them all around me. I do what I can for those I can but I also have no problem making tough decisions when it comes to ending the suffering of an animal who will more than likely be miserabely unhappy with it's severely restricted life.
I realize that others have posted blogs about calves with broken legs, the main difference I see is that in the other cases, the vet came out and A: casted the leg, or B: splinted the leg. In neither case did the vet say the break was so bad it was not worth fixing. As sad as it is to admit, it's just not fair to the animal to FORCE it to live.
Last edited by Nor Cal Farrier : 01-29-2008 at 09:58 AM.
|